A technical side note to my first "A computer from scratch" post and In preparation for the next step, I've examined whether it's possible to build any gate from NANDs. Is it possible? YES! Let's prove it, mathematically.

Too Old For This Shit


Any truth table can be built by combining NANDs.

Lemma 1

Any truth table can be built with OR, AND and NOT.


Any truth table is defined by N bits in input (i1, i2, …, ik, …, iN). A truth table will also have 2N outputs (out1, out2, …, outl, …, out2N).

nothing but the truth

We want to create an expression with only OR, NOT and AND that "represents" each row of inputs, in other words:

  • if outl is 1, then the expression is equal to 1 if and only if all the input match the given inputs
  • if outl is 0, then the expression is equal to 0 independently from the inputs

This allows us to combine all the expression through OR to obtain an expression for the truth table.

In case of outl = 0 the function is easy to build. It's always the function 0, which can be elided from the whole-expression OR later.
In case of outl = 1, for each input we will create a sub expression which is valued 1 if the input matches with the given value for the row, and zero otherwise. ANDing all these together will give us an expression as required (its value will be 0 if any input doesn't match, otherwise 1).

How do we create these subexpressions? If the expected input value is 0 then NOT i, if the expected input value is 1 then i.


An example will make everything clear. Let's create an expression to represent the following truth table:

our truth

  1. Let's ignore all lines with value 0.

their truth

  1. Let's write in ik in place of all the 1s and NOT ik in place of all the 0s.

your truth

  1. Let's AND all columns for each row and put the output in the out cell.

my truth

  1. Finally, ORing together all the rows will give us our final expression.

(NOT i1 AND NOT i2 AND NOT i3) OR (i1 AND NOT i2 AND NOT i3) OR (i1 AND NOT i2 AND NOT i3) OR (i1 AND i2 AND i3)

Lemma 2

AND, OR and NOT can be expressed in terms of NANDs


It's easy to see that

NOT a = a NAND a


By definition:

a AND b = NOT (a NAND b)

And therefore

a AND b = (a NAND b) NAND (a NAND b)


Finally it's easy to verify that

a OR b = (NOT a) NAND (NOT b)

And therefore

a OR b = (a NAND a) NAND (b NAND b)

OR from NAND

Proof (of the theorem)

Every truth table can be expressed in terms on NAND gates by construction:

  1. We can build an expression with only AND, OR, NOT using lemma 1
  2. We can substitute the three expressions for AND, OR and NOT in terms of NAND to get a ginormous, but valid, expression.


(discuss on HN)


A software engineer & Stack Overflow alumnus. Co-founder of Badgie. I write about software development, coding, architecture and team leadership. I also speak at conferences worldwide.


Become my patreon

Join my discord


How Aristotle Created the Computer
Chris Dixon • Mar 20, 2017

What began, in Boole’s words, with an investigation “concerning the nature and constitution of the human mind,” could result in the creation of new minds—artificial minds—that might someday match or even exceed our own.

Read more…